Site-Directed Mutagenesis Mediated by Molecular Modeling and Docking and Its Effect on the Protein–Protein Interactions of the bHLH Transcription Factors SPATULA, HECATE1, and INDEHISCENT
Karina Montserrat González González

Site-Directed Mutagenesis Mediated by Molecular Modeling and Docking and Its Effect on the Protein–Protein Interactions of the bHLH Transcription Factors SPATULA, HECATE1, and INDEHISCENT

Artículo

Te invitamos a leer el artículo "Site-Directed Mutagenesis Mediated by Molecular Modeling and Docking and Its Effect on the Protein–Protein Interactions of the bHLH Transcription Factors SPATULA, HECATE1, and INDEHISCENT" publicado en Plant, ​a cargo del profesor investigador de la Unidad de Genómica Avanzada del Cinvestav Dr. Stefan de Folter, Profesor Investigador de la UGA.

Autores:Pablo López-Gómez / Daniela De La Mora-Franco / Humberto Herrera-Ubaldo / Corina Díaz-Quezada / Luis G. Brieba / Stefan de Folter  

  1. Unidad de Genómica Avanzada (UGA) del Centro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados (Cinvestav)

Felicitamos al estudiantado y profesorado que contribuyeron en esta investigación por su arduo trabajo.

Summary:

The aim of this study was to investigate the biological relevance of predicted sites involved in protein–protein interaction formation by bHLH transcription factors associated with gynoecium development in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). We used AlphaFold2 to generate three-dimensional protein structures of the bHLH proteins SPATULA (SPT), HECATE1 (HEC1), and INDEHISCENT (IND). These structures were subjected to molecular docking using the HawkDock server, enabling the identification of potential interaction sites. PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis was used to modify the predicted interaction sites, followed by testing for protein–protein interaction formation using Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) assays. Furthermore, these modified versions were overexpressed in Arabidopsis to observe whether gynoecium and fruit development would be affected. BiFC assays with the modified versions revealed a complete loss of the SPT-HEC1 interaction and a strong reduction in the SPT-IND interaction. The overexpression experiments in Arabidopsis showed that the 35S::SPT-4A line exhibited strong phenotypes in the development of the medial tissues of the gynoecium, resulting in reduced seed number and shorter fruits. In the 35S::HEC1-2A line, a reduced seed number and shorter fruits were also observed, but no other obvious defects were observed. Finally, the 35S::IND-3A line was less affected than the 35S::IND line. In the latter, medial tissue development was strongly affected, while in the 35S::IND-3A line, it was only slightly affected; however, a reduced seed number and shorter fruits were observed. In summary, the predicted interaction sites are relevant and, when modified, affect gynoecium development in Arabidopsis. The findings demonstrate that predictive computational tools represent a viable strategy for a deeper understanding of protein–protein interactions.


Artículo anterior Visita al Laboratorio de Desarrollo Reproductivo y Apomixis
Siguiente artículo Reconocimiento al Dr. Neftalí Ochoa Alejo
Print
11 Califica este artículo:
Sin calificación
Please login or register to post comments.
CONTÁCTENOS

Logo Cinvestav

Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 2508
Col. San Pedro Zacatenco, Alcaldía Gustavo A. Madero
Ciudad de México, C.P. 07360
Apartado Postal: 14-740, 07000 Ciudad de México

Tel. +52 (55) 5747 3800

Cinvestav © 2025
05/03/2025 12:40:47 p. m.